The UK Intellectual Property Office recently launched the “Lambert 2” toolkit for IP negotiations between industry and universities. It contains 11 models of agreements on a wide range of business situations, as well as useful advice. They are easy to edit, so the text can be adapted to your needs. Please note that this model of agreement is only intended as an illustration. It contains conditions representative of a basic agreement on cooperation in the field of research and which contain provisions relating to the transfer of material, but any such agreement is subject to amendments based on the unique aspects of any cooperation. The Intellectual Property Office has worked with a number of international parties to conclude separate cooperation agreements in a number of countries. Model agreements for collaborative research are available. You will also find guidelines for ip management in the framework of international cooperation and a guide for cross-border decisions of the European Commission. If you find an interesting opportunity for research or development cooperation and discuss a possible agreement, then intellectual property (IP) is one of the key factors you need to consider.
This article contains clear and practical instructions on how to address key IP issues that may arise before, during and after these collaborations. Please note that university-sponsored research procedures must be followed prior to the implementation of an agreement by one of the parties, including admissions at the departmental and academic level via the Cayuse Internal Processing Form (IPF) and documentation of compliance issues. This form allows you to change the terms of an existing agreement (budget revisions, time extensions, etc.). The form can be changed to follow the structure of the original agreement. Standard agreements are starting points and their use is not mandatory. Each model agreement provides for different circumstances and is not sectoral, allowing for flexible use. However, model agreements can be adapted to the particular circumstances of your project. “Cooperation” differs from Harvard-sponsored research OTD creates dozens of successful research collaborations between scientists and industry partners each year.
A written agreement on the implementation of technical audit and evaluation services by K-State faculties and staff on a sponsor`s existing intellectual property. Public Health England has developed a fast-track model agreement (MS Word Document, 62.4KB) to quickly assess possible treatments for Ebola and Zika and share the results with stakeholders for a coordinated global response. Following consultations, it is now available as a model agreement that can be adapted to any crisis concerning human, animal and/or environmental health. The issue of IP ownership in the foreground can be a stumbling block in cooperation negotiations. Common ownership is a possibility, but this can have significant drawbacks, as shown in Box 1 (see below), so it is desirable to reach an alternative provision. While intellectual property can be beneficial, the primary objective of the negotiations should be to ensure that both sides enjoy the broader benefits of cooperation. The decision guide is intended only for the use of bilateral cooperation agreements in the field of research. There is no decision guide for the 4 consortium agreements. This is because there are too many possible alternatives for multi-party research. Co-owners can, as a general rule, market the patented invention without the consent of the other co-owners.
However, in most countries, a co-owner of a patent cannot license a third party without the consent of the other co-owner.